AAA Test

• Home
• GBIF
• EML
• RTF
• Versions
• Rights
• Cite this

Downloads

Download the latest version of the metadata-only resource metadata as EML or RTF:

Versions

The table below shows only published versions of the resource that are publicly accessible.

How to cite

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

De Bie E, Okavango Research Institute Organisation (2016): AAA Test. v1.7. Test Organisation #1. Dataset/Metadata. https://ipt.gbif.org/resource?r=testfeb16&v=1.7

Rights

Researchers should respect the following rights statement:

The publisher and rights holder of this work is Test Organisation #1. To the extent possible under law, the publisher has waived all rights to these data and has dedicated them to the Public Domain (CC0 1.0). Users may copy, modify, distribute and use the work, including for commercial purposes, without restriction.

GBIF Registration

This resource has been registered with GBIF, and assigned the following GBIF UUID: 1bb3160d-3a62-4f32-8385-9dd61ef64cc6.  Test Organisation #1 publishes this resource, and is itself registered in GBIF as a data publisher endorsed by GBIF Secretariat.

Keywords

Samplingevent; relevées; groundwater dependent vegetation;

Contacts

Who created the resource:

Who can answer questions about the resource:

Who filled in the metadata:

Who else was associated with the resource:

Geographic Coverage

Flanders, Watina Network

Taxonomic Coverage

Plantae

Temporal Coverage

Project Data

No Description available

The personnel involved in the project:

Sampling Methods

Sampling Methods Vegetation surveys Vegetation, neighbouring each WATINA Piezometer is described using a nearby vegetation plot. In forests the plot measures 10X10m² in open vegetations this plot measures 3X3 m². The Piezometer usually is one of the corners of the plot. A orientated location sketch was created for every survey, to make repeatability possible. For every plot, all occurring species were determined and for every vertical layer (Trees, Shrubs, Herbs and Mosses) the coverage was measured (Londo scale). Londo scale Low coverage High coverage Code coverage Code coverage *.1 1% 1- 5-10% *.2 2-3% 1+ 10-15% *.4 4-5% 2 15-25% combination with: 3 25-35% r. some occurrences (1 or 2) 4 35-45% p. little occurrences (about 10) 5 45-55% a. many occurrences (about 100) 6 55-65% m. a lot occurrences (about 1000) 7 65-75% 8 75-85% 9 85-95% 10 95-100%

Method step description:

1. Londo scale Low coverage High coverage Code coverage Code coverage *.1 1% 1- 5-10% *.2 2-3% 1+ 10-15% *.4 4-5% 2 15-25% combination with: 3 25-35% r. some occurrences (1 or 2) 4 35-45% p. little occurrences (about 10) 5 45-55% a. many occurrences (about 100) 6 55-65% m. a lot occurrences (about 1000) 7 65-75% 8 75-85% 9 85-95% 10 95-100%

Additional Metadata